<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>DomainWorks</title>
      <link>http://www.domainworks.biz/</link>
      <description>News and analysis about the business of domain names, domain investing, domain stocks and domain-based advertising. </description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2007</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 16:58:43 -0500</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

            <item>
         <title>Iraq.com Domain Name Being Auctioned</title>
         <description><![CDATA[The domain name <a href="http://Iraq.com">Iraq.com</a> is being <a href="http://www.sedo.com/search/details.php4?domain=iraq.com&amp;partnerid=14460&amp;language=e">auctioned off at Sedo</a>, where the bidding has reached 450,000 Euros, or about $632,215 in U.S. dollars. The bidding started last Thursday at 2,000 Euros and has risen steadily, but has not yet reached the reserve price. The auction is scheduled to conclude Thursday at 2 p.m. EST. Sedo's auction process typically begins once an initial offer has been made on a domain placed for sale with the service. That offer then becomes the opening bid.  

<a href="http://whois.domaintools.com/iraq.com">WHOIS records</a> list the owner of Iraq.com as <a href="http://www.kuwaitnet.net/en/">KuwaitNet Internet Services</a>, which registered the name in May 1997. The company offers managed hosting and dedicated servers, and is also an ICANN-accredited registrar.

Given the intense debate about the ongoing U.S. war in Iraq, there might be any number of parties with an interest in acquiring the domain. The (apparently) interim Iraqi government web site appears to be at <a href="http://iraqigovernment.org">iraqigovernment.org</a> while the U.S. Embassy uses <a href="http://iraq.usembassy.gov">iraq.usembassy.gov</a>. In Aug. 2005 ICANN authorized the fledgling Iraqi government to manage .iq, the top-level domain for the country, which had been<a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8845718"> in limbo</a> since the previous operators (InfoCom Corp.) were indicted in 2002.]]></description>
         <link>http://www.domainworks.biz/2007/09/iraqcom_domain_name_being_auct.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.domainworks.biz/2007/09/iraqcom_domain_name_being_auct.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Top Resales</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 16:58:43 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Top 5 Domain Branding Tips For Bloggers</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Domain names are essential tools for bloggers. They become your brand, and are a valuable business tool. Managed correctly, domain names can also be invaluable in helping obtain attract traffic from search engines. Investing a small investment of time to learn about domains can pay dividends on many levels. Here are five domain branding tips for bloggers.     

<strong>1. Register Your Domain For More than One Year: </strong> There are several advantages to multi-year domain registrations. Foremost among them is the fact that Google favors domains that are registered beyond the current year. This bias by Google is part of a broader domain weighting system that also favors older domains that have been hosting active web sites for years. Google considers domains with "good age" and multi-year registrations less likely to be search spam or trying to game the system. Beyond the search benefits, multi-year registrations almost always save you money through a discount from your registrar, and make it much less likely that you'll lose control of the domain by forgetting to renew it. This happens, all the time. In February, 2006 the domain Jasmin.com expired and <a href="http://www.domainworks.biz/2006/02/a_310000_mistake.html">was sold at auction for $310,000</a>.    

<strong>2. Shop For An Affordable But Credible Domain Registrar:</strong> There are millions of domain name owners who continue to pay $30 to $35 each time they purchase or renew a domain. But don't just opt for the cheapest provider or the one with the flashiest ads. The victims of the <a href="http://www.domainworks.biz/2007/03/icann_to_sue_registerfly.html">meltdown at RegisterFly</a> almost certainly wish they'd been more selective in choosing their provider. Opt for a registrar that provides the combination of a good price, corporate stability and accountability. <a href="http://www.kqzyfj.com/click-1870324-10378406" target="_top" onmouseover="window.status='http://www.godaddy.com';return true;" onmouseout="window.status=' ';return true;"><a href="http://www.tkqlhce.com/click-1870324-10378406" target="_top" onmouseover="window.status='http://www.godaddy.com';return true;" onmouseout="window.status=' ';return true;">Go Daddy</a><img src="http://www.tqlkg.com/image-1870324-10378406" width="1" height="1" border="0"/>.com</a> <img src="http://www.awltovhc.com/image-1870324-10378406" width="1" height="1" border="0"/>sells domains for about $9, while you can get names for <a href="http://www.jdoqocy.com/click-1870324-10365672" target="_top" onmouseover="window.status='http://www.1and1.com';return true;" onmouseout="window.status=' ';return true;">$5.99 at 1&1 Interent</a><img src="http://www.awltovhc.com/image-1870324-10365672" width="1" height="1" border="0"/>.]]></description>
         <link>http://www.domainworks.biz/2007/05/top_5_domain_tips_for_bloggers.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.domainworks.biz/2007/05/top_5_domain_tips_for_bloggers.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Domain Name Aftermarket</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 15:33:02 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>RegisterFly Web Site Down ... Again</title>
         <description><![CDATA[RegisterFly's web site was offline for much of the day, as <a href="http://news.netcraft.com/archives/2007/03/06/registerfly_site_goes_offline.html">documented by Netcraft</a>, with posts at RegisterFlies attributing the downtime to a <a href="http://www.registerflies.com/control-of-registerfly.com.html">transfer of the registerfly.com domain</a> to give the new CEO better control over the site. Meanwhile, ICANN has asked a California court to <a href="http://www.icann.org/announcements/announcement-02mar07.htm">force RegisterFly</a> to turn over its database of domain data and compel an emergency audit of its books and records. ICANN has also reached out to central domain registries to protect domain owners. "Last Friday, ICANN convened a telephone conference among those needed to implement a plan that will help cease unintended deletions," ICANN said on <a href="http://blog.icann.org/?p=32">its blog</a>. "This will prevent names from being deleted from the registry and becoming available for re-registration by others." While it has taken steps to prevent domain deletions, ICANN acknowledged that "the options for customers to transfer their names to another registrar at this stage are limited." Additional covergae can be found at <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DailyDomainerNews/~3/99751840/200796-registerfly-meltdown-continues.html">Daily Domainer</a> and  <a href="http://frankschilling.typepad.com/my_weblog/2007/03/icann_blogs_for.html">Frank Schilling</a>.]]></description>
         <link>http://www.domainworks.biz/2007/03/icann_to_sue_registerfly.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.domainworks.biz/2007/03/icann_to_sue_registerfly.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">RegisterFly</category>
        
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">registerfly</category>
        
         <pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 21:49:44 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>ProBlogger.com Expires, Up for Auction</title>
         <description><![CDATA[The <a href="http://www.problogger.com">ProBlogger.com</a> domain has expired and is up for auction on <a href="https://www.tdnam.com/"><a href="http://www.tkqlhce.com/click-1870324-10378406" target="_top" onmouseover="window.status='http://www.godaddy.com';return true;" onmouseout="window.status=' ';return true;">Go Daddy</a><img src="http://www.tqlkg.com/image-1870324-10378406" width="1" height="1" border="0"/>'s Domain Name AfterMarket</a> site. Bidding is up to $95 with eight days to go. There have been seven bids already, and the domain appears to get about 3,000 visitors a month, despite no real content at the site. There's been a lot of interest in blogging domains, and even with the <a href="http://wisdump.com/web/why-blog-networks-failed/">failure of some of the blog networks</a>, there could be strong interest in this domain. 

<a href="http://www.problogger.com">ProBlogger.com</a> was registered to <a href="http://whois.domaintools.com/<a href="http://www.problogger.com">ProBlogger.com</a>">Matt Winkler</a> from Chatsworth, Calif. The Wayback Machine shows that in <a href="http://web.archive.org/web/20060518015906/http://<a href="http://www.problogger.com">ProBlogger.com</a>/">May of 2006</a> the site featured a placeholder page that described the coming debut of a "new type of blogging community. Offering innovative technology, fully customizeable layouts, image hosting, and many other features, Problogger is sure to breath new life into the blogging community." Earlier searches from 2004 show a blog with Lorem Ipsum text.

So who's interested in <a href="http://www.problogger.com">ProBlogger.com</a>? It would be a natural for <a href="http://www.problogger.net">Darren Rowse</a>, who has built one of the blogosphere's most successful and respected brands at <a href="http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/02/22/problogger-readers-meetup-new-york/">ProBlogger.net</a>. It might make sense for Darren to re-invest some of his six-figure blogging income to register the .com, if only as a defensive strategy to prevent another blogger from buying the name and diluting the brand equity he has built on the .net domain. ]]></description>
         <link>http://www.domainworks.biz/2007/02/probloggercom_expires_up_for_a.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.domainworks.biz/2007/02/probloggercom_expires_up_for_a.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Domain Name Aftermarket</category>
        
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">auctions</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">domain names</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">domains</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">problogger</category>
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 11:39:40 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>&apos;Act of God&apos; May Extend Expiring Domains</title>
         <description><![CDATA[What happens if your domain is expiring and you can't reach the registrar's web site? There have been many stories about <a href="http://news.netcraft.com/archives/2006/12/27/taiwan_earthquake_limits_access_to_chinese_hosts.html">connectivity problems in Asia</a> due to the earthquake in Taiwan, which severed underground cables. The China International Network Information Center (CNNIC) is considering extensions for 10,000 domain owners who lost their expiring .com domains when the <a href="http://www.techweb.com/showArticle.jhtml?articleId=196801368">couldn't reach the registrar's web site</a> to renew them.  

"Because the domain names are lost due to an act of God, enterprises and individuals involved may be appropriately compensated by the domain name server, but the scheme is still under discussion," the Xinhua new service quoted a source close to the CNNIC. ]]></description>
         <link>http://www.domainworks.biz/2007/01/act_of_god_may_extend_expiring.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.domainworks.biz/2007/01/act_of_god_may_extend_expiring.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Registrars</category>
        
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">domains</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">earthquake</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">registrars</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">taiwan</category>
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 17:45:41 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>The History of Domain Tasting</title>
         <description><![CDATA[The practice of "domain" tasting" dates back to 20001, when DotRegistrar and IAregistry began  using the five-day add-drop period to test drive domain names for their commercial potential. That's the introduction to <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/historical_analysis_domain_tasting/">The Closing Window: A Historical Analysis of Domain Tasting</a>, an informative article by Frank Schilling at CircleID. Schilling, who prepared the analysis for members of the the ICANN Business Constituency, notes that VeriSign initially resisted domain tasting, and sought to discourage the registrars who were engaging in the practice. His analysis concludes:<blockquote>VeriSign will have to close the window, just as it did in 2002. Only it may be harder this time because they have permitted the practice for so long. The best solution would likely be for VeriSign to send an email to all registrars announcing a restocking fee effective next-week. Even a 2 cent restocking fee (trivial for real errors) would be enough to curb tasting dramatically.</blockquote> 
   ]]></description>
         <link>http://www.domainworks.biz/2007/01/the_history_of_domain_tasting.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.domainworks.biz/2007/01/the_history_of_domain_tasting.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Domain Parking Strategies</category>
        
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">domain tasting</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">domains</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">name tasting</category>
        
         <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 22:09:37 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Britney, KFed Miss Out on JaydenFederline.com</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Are we shocked that Britney Spears and her rocket scientist hubby Kevin Federline are not as adept at registering baby domain names as <a href="http://www.domainworks.biz/archives/2006/Jun/01/angelina_jolie_snaps_up_shilohjoliepittcom.html">Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt</a>? Despite buying a month of secrecy by leaking a fake name after the Sept. 12 birth, Britney and KFed still couldn't manage to secure the tot's domain name.

Instead, Leonard Lee of Union City, Calif. is the <a href="http://whois.domaintools.com/jaydenfederline.com">proud owner of JaydenFederline.com</a>. Lee purchased the name on Oct. 18, shortly after the <a href="http://thebosh.com/archives/2006/10/is_britney_spearss_baby_really_named_sutton.php">first news items</a> mentioning the name. The birth certificate didn't become public until today, and JaydenFederline.org was <a href="http://whois.domaintools.com/jaydenfederline.org">registered in short order</a>. The poor .net top-level domain doesn't cut it anymore, as <a href="http://whois.domaintools.com/jaydenfederline.net">jaydenfederline.net</a> was still available as of 3:30 pm Eastern time.

So who's the sucker who registered SuttonPierceFederline.com? It was a private registration, so we can't know for sure. But we suspect KFed, who isn't getting any smarter getting dropped on his head by those WWE wrestlers.]]></description>
         <link>http://www.domainworks.biz/2006/10/extra_month_doesnt_help_britne.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.domainworks.biz/2006/10/extra_month_doesnt_help_britne.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Celebrity Domains</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 15:07:59 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>5 Million Domains for .ORG Registry</title>
         <description>The Public Interest Registry (PIR), managers of the .ORG registry announced today that 5,000,000 .ORG domains have now been registered worldwide. The growth of .ORG was boosted in July of 2005 by PIR&quot;S decision to offer .ORG registrars discounts targeting developing regions of the world, including South America, Asia, and Africa. The promotions have resulted in a 50 percent increase in .ORG domain registrations in the targeted regions. In India, growth has reached a 93 percent annual increase.

&quot;This is a significant milestone for the .ORG registry and we are excited that the number of .ORG registrations worldwide has increased by over 25 percent in less than 1 year,&quot; said Edward G. Viltz, President and CEO of PIR. &quot;PIR is especially pleased that the global noncommercial community has an expanding online presence to support their organizational objectives. In addition, commensurate with this growth, the PIR Team is committed to continue expanding our support of the .ORG community on relevant Internet issues and to ensure community interests are represented within the domain name space.&quot;</description>
         <link>http://www.domainworks.biz/2006/09/5_million_domains_for_org_regi.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.domainworks.biz/2006/09/5_million_domains_for_org_regi.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Registrars</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2006 15:53:51 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>ICANN Group Lets Domain Name Expire</title>
         <description><![CDATA[The Internet Corporation For Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) oversees the Internet's domain name system. But an ICANN committee seems to have had trouble looking after its own domain. ICANN's ISPs and Connectivity Providers working group has lost its domain, which apparently expired and was bought by a pay-per-click parking business. The domain ispcp.org was used to <a href="http://web.archive.org/web/20050203200217/www.ispcp.org/">conduct ICANN business</a> as far back as 2001, but now displays a <a href="http://www.ispcp.org/"><a href="http://www.tkqlhce.com/click-1870324-10378406" target="_top" onmouseover="window.status='http://www.godaddy.com';return true;" onmouseout="window.status=' ';return true;">Go Daddy</a><img src="http://www.tqlkg.com/image-1870324-10378406" width="1" height="1" border="0"/> parking page</a> and is registered to an email address at virtualclicks.com. (Link via <a href="http://www.icannwatch.org/article.pl?sid=06/09/09/1214228">ICANN Watch</a>)]]></description>
         <link>http://www.domainworks.biz/2006/09/icann_group_lets_domain_name_e.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.domainworks.biz/2006/09/icann_group_lets_domain_name_e.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">ICANN</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 14:51:50 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>10 Most Unintentionally Funny Domains</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Did you *really* look closely at that domain before you registered it? Not everyone does, and the result is that sometimes companies and online services build their brands around unfortunate domains that can be read several ways. Independent Sources has supplied a list of 10 of the worst ill-named domains.

An example: The Pen Island company registering www.penisland.net. Then of course, there’s the Italian Power Generator company that chose www.powergenitalia.com. If you haven't seen it already, <a href="http://independentsources.com/2006/07/12/worst-company-urls/">check out the full list</a>. It's a major hoot.]]></description>
         <link>http://www.domainworks.biz/2006/08/10_most_unintentionally_funny.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.domainworks.biz/2006/08/10_most_unintentionally_funny.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Domain Name Research</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2006 21:37:33 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>eNom Acquires BulkRegister</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.enom.com">eNom</a> has acquired <a href="http://www.bulkregister.com">BulkRegister, LLC</a> in a deal that combines providers that focus on high-volume customers. BulkRegister, which had been owned by hosting company Alabanza, manages more than 1.5 million domains for its 35,000 customers. eNom said the acquisition gives it more than 6.8 million domain names under management, allowing it to pass Network Solutions to become the <a href="http://www.enom.com/inthenews.asp?pr=060726bulkregister&mc=no">second-largest registrar </a>after <a href="http://www.tkqlhce.com/click-1870324-10378406" target="_top" onmouseover="window.status='http://www.godaddy.com';return true;" onmouseout="window.status=' ';return true;">Go Daddy</a><img src="http://www.tqlkg.com/image-1870324-10378406" width="1" height="1" border="0"/>.</p>
<p>"We are excited about this significant and synergistic addition to our domain platform," said Paul Stahura, founder and chief executive officer of eNom. "Both eNom and BulkRegister have built up strong, loyal and successful customer bases, by providing great tools, high quality service, and a solid technology platform. The combination of the two companies is a natural fit."</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.domainworks.biz/2006/07/enom_acquires_bulkregister.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.domainworks.biz/2006/07/enom_acquires_bulkregister.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">enom</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2006 08:23:27 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Boing Boing on Kiting: Year Late, Dollar Short</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Boing Boing is usually a great read, but this week's item on <a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2006/07/24/domain_name_kiting_s.html">domain name kiting</a> and the add-grace period (AGP) wasn't its best work. The practice - which Boing Boing's Cory Doctorow called a "new online scam" - has been widely discussed for more than a year (see July 2005 post at <a href="http://news.netcraft.com/archives/2005/07/28/domain_payperclick_services_growing_rapidly.html">Netcraft</a>, among others that mention the practice), and has since been written about by the <a href="http://internet.seekingalpha.com/article/8019">Internet Stock Blog</a> and <a href="http://joi.ito.com/archives/2005/12/01/the_parked_domain_monetization_business.html">Joi Ito</a> (a prominent <a href="http://www.google.com/search?ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=joi+ito&domains=boingboing.net&sitesearch=boingboing.net">friend of Boing Boing</a>), among many others.

But no one has been more visible on this issue than <a href="http://www.tkqlhce.com/click-1870324-10378406" target="_top" onmouseover="window.status='http://www.godaddy.com';return true;" onmouseout="window.status=' ';return true;">Go Daddy</a><img src="http://www.tqlkg.com/image-1870324-10378406" width="1" height="1" border="0"/> CEO Bob Parsons, who was the first person to use the term "domain name kiting" on his <a href="http://www.bobparsons.com/MayKiting.html">Hot Points blog</a> on May 10. Parsons then took his case to the pages of <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/jun2006/tc20060605_633379.htm?chan=smallbiz_smallbiz+index+page_technology+">Business Week</a>.

Maybe Cory Doctorow wasn't aware of the lineage of the term when he linked to DomainNameKiting.com. A whois search shows that the domain name is registered at <a href="http://www.tkqlhce.com/click-1870324-10378406" target="_top" onmouseover="window.status='http://www.godaddy.com';return true;" onmouseout="window.status=' ';return true;">Go Daddy</a><img src="http://www.tqlkg.com/image-1870324-10378406" width="1" height="1" border="0"/> and <a href="http://whois.domaintools.com/domainnamekiting.com">"owned" by Domains By Proxy</a>, a privacy service run by <a href="http://www.tkqlhce.com/click-1870324-10378406" target="_top" onmouseover="window.status='http://www.godaddy.com';return true;" onmouseout="window.status=' ';return true;">Go Daddy</a><img src="http://www.tqlkg.com/image-1870324-10378406" width="1" height="1" border="0"/>. Is the domain name really owned by a third party that just happened to use all <a href="http://www.tkqlhce.com/click-1870324-10378406" target="_top" onmouseover="window.status='http://www.godaddy.com';return true;" onmouseout="window.status=' ';return true;">Go Daddy</a><img src="http://www.tqlkg.com/image-1870324-10378406" width="1" height="1" border="0"/>'s services to register and cloak the ownership info on the name? The related forum, DomainKitingSucks.com is also owned by - you guessed it - Domains by Proxy.]]></description>
         <link>http://www.domainworks.biz/2006/07/boing_boing_on_kiting_year_lat.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.domainworks.biz/2006/07/boing_boing_on_kiting_year_lat.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Domain Parking Strategies</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 17:50:56 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Domain Incubation: Outsourced Domain Improvement</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Domain incubation is a new strategy in which domain owners "outsource" their site management to a third-party service that provides content and link-building support. Internet domain incubation differs from parking in that it doesn't generate revenue, but can improve a domain's resale value by improving its Google rank and the number of incoming links.

<a href="http://www.domainincubation.com">DomainIncubation.com</a> is a free service from Coast Internet Solutions, Inc. of Edgewater, NJ. Participants point their names at the nameservers for the service, which develops a web site to improve the value of the domain. DomainIncubation.com keeps the revenue from ads that are placed on the site, while the domain owner gets the benefit of improved PageRank and backlinks, which in turn can improve the name's resale value or establish enough traffic to begin monetizing the site through a domain parking service. The service says the designs won't be "first-class" but won't be scraper sites either, providing an example at <a href="http://www.security-guard.org/">Security-guard.org</a>. The sample links are managed by blog software or a script that pulls directory content from the Open Directory Project (dmoz.og).

"This offer is intended for those with poor quality domains," notes the intro to the concept at the Domain Incubation web site. "You will sell a domain with some PR and backlinks for more than you will without them. We do all of the work and take the risk that you could remove your domain at anytime, that's why we keep any and all money from advertising. If you think your domain is hot and will generate money from type-in traffic, you should use a domain parking service that will pay you part of the income."]]></description>
         <link>http://www.domainworks.biz/2006/07/domain_incubation_outsourced_d.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.domainworks.biz/2006/07/domain_incubation_outsourced_d.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Domain Investing</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sun, 09 Jul 2006 21:30:23 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Why Google Is A Domain Registrar</title>
         <description><![CDATA[It's been 18 months since Google <a href="http://news.netcraft.com/archives/2005/01/31/google_is_now_a_domain_registrar.html">became a domain registrar</a>, a move that initially shook up the domain and hosting businesses amid the notion that Google might make domain names available for free. Before long, Google watchers advanced an alternate theory: that Google would use its access to the list of recently sold domains to clean up its search results, resetting a site's PageRank when its domain changes hands.

That theory has now been confirmed, thanks to the sharp-eyes of Kevin Murphy at <a href="http://texturbation.com/blog/">Texturbation</a>, who noted <a href="http://texturbation.com/blog/2006/06/29/why-google-became-a-domain-name-registrar/">comments by Google employee (and ICANN chair) Vint Cerf</a> in the recent domain marketplace discussion at ICANN's conference in Marrakech. Here's the cogent excerpt (from a much longer transcript):

<strong>VINT CERF:</strong> When a domain name has expired, and then it's re-assigned to someone else, what happens to the SOA (Start of Authority) record for that domain name as to its start date? Does that change automatically or does it stay the same or are there circumstances where a domain name changes hands but it doesn't look like it has if you are looking at its birth date?]]></description>
         <link>http://www.domainworks.biz/2006/07/why_google_is_a_domain_registr.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.domainworks.biz/2006/07/why_google_is_a_domain_registr.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Google</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Registrars</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2006 09:47:56 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Would You Pay $29K for CondoleezaRice.com?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.hillnews.com/">The Hill</a> has an excellent analysis of <a href="http://www.hillnews.com/thehill/export/TheHill/News/Frontpage/062106/news3.html">domain names tied to the 2008 presidential campaign</a>, which have been targeted by speculators. "Many of the political domain names have been bought as investments with the intention of being sold to the potential presidential campaigns," notes The Hill's Kelly McCormack. "Other buyers acquired the Web addresses to post endorsements or bash the presidential hopefuls. Either way, the cyberbrigade has hit almost all the presidential hopefuls."

A bunch of 2008-related names are being for sale through a Blogger site titled <a href="http://politicaldomainworld.blogspot.com/">Political Domain World</a>, which touts names including condoleezzarice08.com and johnmccain08.net.]]></description>
         <link>http://www.domainworks.biz/2006/06/would_you_pay_29k_for_condolee.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.domainworks.biz/2006/06/would_you_pay_29k_for_condolee.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Top Resales</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 10:59:14 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
